Bicycle Collective Hub Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

4 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

To provide a building for a related nonprofit organization, salt lake city bicycle collective.

Constructed and finished a building that houses a related nonprofit organization, salt lake city bicycle collective.

Revenue model: No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Mission deployment rate: Limited
Program expense ratio: 79.6%; rating input score 80
Fundraising efficiency: $0 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: Limited
Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.3; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.13; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: 31.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: Limited
Asset growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: 79.6% of spending went to programs
Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $219K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $112K · 4 people listed
Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 3 filed schedules
Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.