Bible in 90 Days
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810582002
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7137872114
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $10,162
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
People named in this filing
- Dr Laura Peterson (Chairman)
- B Kent Woodard (Treasurer)
- Carolyn Hufstetler (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
(1) To encourage people to read the entire Bible; and(2) To provide exceptional resources to help them do so.
What it reported doing in 2014
Since 2002, Bible in 90 Days (BIND) has provided and enhanced curriculum, materials, video lessons, and attendant resources to churches, small groups and communities that help people read the entire Bible from cover to cover, usually in 90 days. The ministry served churches and provided scholarships to recipients ranging from prison inmates to rehab mission residents to military personnel to churches and families in need. BIND has worked to educate laity, the clergy, and the public at-large that they can read the entire Bible and describe how they will benefit from doing so.During 2013, BIND decided to wind down its operations. The programs it previously conducted are now carried on by Scripture Awakening (SA), another 501(c)(3) organization located in North Carolina. A final grant was made to SA this year for all of BIND's remaining assets and BIND formally terminated its existence in 2015.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 30
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 80.9%; rating input score 81
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -176% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -53.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -50.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.