Bibb County Medical Society Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
581169020
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Macon, GA, USA
Phone
4787435215
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$143,847
Expenses
$135,511
Assets
$451,870
Liabilities
$72,431

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KEISHA R CALLINS MD MPH (PRESIDENT)
  • CANDI NOBLES-JAMES MD (PRESIDENT EL)

People named in this filing

  • R PAUL RODDENBERRY MD (PAST PRESIDE)
  • KEISHA R CALLINS MD MPH (PRESIDENT)
  • CANDI NOBLES-JAMES MD (PRESIDENT EL)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Medical society

What it reported doing in 2024

To promote the health of all citizens of the community by bringing together the physicians and certain other persons in allied health fields into one organization; to foster friendly and ethical relations among physicians; to provide mediacl leadership in community activities pertaining to health; to insure high standards of medical practice; to maintain the good reputation of the profession and to protect the interests of it's members; to support the education and deverlopment of allied health professions; to encourage the enactment of just laws for the protection of community health; and to join with other similar societies to form the medical association of Georgia and the americal medical association.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.33; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.