Bhutanese Community Organization of Minnesota-bcom-
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364670106
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Roseville, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6512023131
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $185,441
- Expenses
- $129,000
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- MAN CHUWAN (BOARD CHAIR)
- DAWA TAMANG (SECRETARY)
- SIVA HUMAGAI (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Refugee Services: BCOM has been helping newly arrived refugee families in tne following service areas:1)Social Service: BCOM has been providing these service since 2012, connecting families
What it reported doing in 2022
Refugee Services: BCOM has been helping newly arrived refugee families (1) Social Services: BCOM has been providing these services since 2012
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42.9%; rating input score 43
- Program expense ratio: 61.6%; rating input score 62
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 30.4%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 42.9% of revenue deployed · 61.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $143K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.