Beyond the Label
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 332032856
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
- Location
- Napa, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7073636218
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Autism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $41,127
- Expenses
- $11,760
- Assets
- $30,790
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RAQUEL HURLBUT (President & CEO)
- NATALIE LUNA (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- RAQUEL HURLBUT (President & CEO)
- NATALIE LUNA (Vice President)
- ERIN O'BRA (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our purpose and our goal is to help support autistic and other special needs individuals and their families by providing resources such as sponsoring inclusive events, providing education, and offering grants/scholarships to impacted individuals, families, or educators working with special needs children. Our organization works to provide support to children with an Autism diagnosis. This diagnosis impacts 1 in every 31 children. Our organizations provides resources to increase community acceptance where children and others with disabilities feel safe, accepted and valued.
What it reported doing in 2025
Our main program service is an annual Autism Awareness Walk that helps support autistic and other special needs individuals and their families. The walk is an inclusive event providing support to impacted families. It also serves as a fund raiser to support other activities such as an inclusive bowling events and funds that provide grants to educational professionals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 1
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.4%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 2
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 71.4%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.62; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.4% of revenue deployed · 1.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $179 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.