Beyond Living
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 872871288
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 0000000000
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Temporary Housing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $116,761
- Expenses
- $111,415
- Assets
- $3,089
- Liabilities
- $14,846
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Keith Aichele (CEO Executive Director)
- Rachel Surges (President)
People named in this filing
- Keith Aichele (CEO Executive Director)
- Rachel Surges (President)
- Brian Jackson (Board of Directors)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Beyond Living provides integrated housing assistance and workforce development services to individuals in need including job training employment placement support and stable housing solutions to help participants achieve self-sufficiency and economic stability It accomplishes this through training programs an integrated housing and vocational training program and the unique gift of furniture to those in need
What it reported doing in 2025
Beyond Living continued to achieve over 100000 in program revenue while training multiple individuals on workforce development skills including renovation skills marketing funnel development and logistics management We continued to support new program members in transition from homelessness to stability Our furniture gifting service expanded reaching over 200 families total from gifting to receiving of furniture
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.1%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.6%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.81; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 39.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 57.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 41.4% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28.6% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.1% of revenue deployed · 0.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $96 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.