Beyond Animal Sheltering

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
992057327
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Mars Hill, NC, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$63,718
Expenses
$842
Assets
$62,876

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ronald Gallaway (Board President resigned after 2m)
  • Adam Cotton (Interim Board President)

People named in this filing

  • Ronald Gallaway (Board President resigned after 2m)
  • Adam Cotton (Interim Board President)
  • Chelsea Fogal (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Beyond Animal Sheltering is a 501c3 nonprofit supporting and supplementing Madison County Animal Services to promote the well-being of pets in their care and in the community. This year we created a system for the shelter to receive community donations during Hurricane Helene ensuring ongoing care and support for animals affected by the disaster. We also secured a major grant for building improvements and funded a double-wide building to expand volunteer and foster programming space.

What it reported doing in 2024

Donor Support and Restricted Fund Development: Beyond Animal Sheltering established a new mechanism for community members to make tax-deductible contributions specifically designated to support Madison County Animal Services. This system ensures that donor funds are directed toward the care and well-being of shelter pets and related program needs rather than the countys general operating fund. The program increased transparency donor confidence and the shelters capacity to receive and utilize community support effectively. This program did not require any start-up expense as we utilized virtual fundraising platforms such as Donorbox Stripe that assess a fee as donations are made.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 98.7%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 74.67; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.