Beverlys Exhibitions Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850652618
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2127526400
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $149,650
- Expenses
- $195,738
- Assets
- $2,819
- Liabilities
- $21,511
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
People named in this filing
- LEAH DIXON (CREATIVE DIRECTOR)
- GABE SCHULMAN (FINANCE DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Beverly's is an artist-run 501c3 non profit that highlights social possiblities for the visual arts and artists in the service industry and nightlife. Beverly's operates an indisciplinary space where the visual arts, nightlife, and production talent that comes together to build community, which allows for dedicated arts funding and coprograms and facilitations the presentation of their exhibitions and off-site programs globally. Through the teamwork of the artist board, the organization focuses on design collaboration and memtorship to continue beverly's mission to create new possibilitites for the visual arts in nightlife and public practice.
What it reported doing in 2025
In january of 2025, beverly's teamed up with other neighborhood arts organizations, entrance gallery and my pet ram gallery to organize, curate and prsent an art sale benefit taht included over 50 New York city-based visual artists. All sales of artworks from this benefit were run through beverly's exhibition corp and 100% of the proceeds were re-distributed to laxart for los angeles-based artiests who lost their homes and studios in the wildfires. This benefit was wildly successful, raising over $24,000 in less than 48 hours and showed the ongoing bicoastal camaraderie between visuaul artists working in New York city and los angeles. Two members of the beverly's exhibitions group team donated a week of their time to organize this event. We did not spend money on this, as all funds from the proceeds of the artwork sales, were immediately distributed to a California-based non-profit (to distribute to artists in need as a result of the los angeles wildfires.)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 10
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 5
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 11%; rating input score 11
- Program expense ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 8
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -30.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 7.63; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 61.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -13.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -39.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 11% of revenue deployed · 8.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.