Beverly Farms Improvement Society Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
046130088
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Beverly Farms, MA, USA
Phone
9789223653
Rating
53
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Agricultural Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,363
Expenses
$35,668
Assets
$207,003
Liabilities
$5,973

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WENDY DRINKWATER (PRESIDENT)
  • JEFFREY HORVITZ (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WENDY DRINKWATER (PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREA BRAY (TREASURER)
  • DEBORA LUNT (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To aid, assist, and encourage the city of beverly and the public to provide and preserve the natural beauties of the city of beverly

What it reported doing in 2013

Seasonal paintings and maintenance, west tree planters, horse trough

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 36
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45.4%; rating input score 45
  • Program expense ratio: 22.1%; rating input score 22

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -105.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.8; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.5% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -70.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.1% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 45.4% of revenue deployed · 22.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.