Bettina Network Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
471215794
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Cambridge, MA, USA
Phone
6174979166
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Homeless Centers

Reported finances

Expenses
$1,821
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$1,642

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARCELINE M DONALDSON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARCELINE M DONALDSON (PRESIDENT)
  • ROBERT A BENNETT (TREASURER, S)
  • TRUDY VANSLYCK (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation shall not be conducted for profit. Its exclusive charitable object and purposes are the receiving and maintaining of a fund or funds; and applying the income and/or principal thereof to promote the general welfare of individuals who collect welfare benefits, homeless individuals and individuals whose income level is below the minimum amount stated in this corporation's bylaws. These individuals must have demonstrated an interest in becoming entrepreneurs with the goal of starting their own business. The beneficiaries will have the option of either working in bettina homes, at pay rates stated in the bylaws, with the goal of learning how to operate a business; or, those who show a demonstrated interest of pursuing higher education or building a career by initially working at a low paying job, but has the opportunity for advancement, shall reside in the house rent free. The bylaws shall state the criteria for the selection of qualified beneficiaries. The income may also b

What it reported doing in 2022

To help low income individuals start business

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.