Better Health 4Kids
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271354776
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Nashville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6159889810
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Pediatrics
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $125,531
- Expenses
- $141,165
- Assets
- $12,499
- Liabilities
- $400
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMY THURMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- AMY THURMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- NANCY ALLEN (BOARD MEMBER)
- ROBERT CHURCHWELL JR (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fostering access to preventative health care and advancing evidence based on prevention and education for the optimal health of children.
What it reported doing in 2013
Childrens health fund - this program was launched in may 2013 and is a program that provides temporary financial assitance for families so they may access pediatric health care services for their children who are uninsured or underinsured.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 19
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 20.2%; rating input score 20
- Program expense ratio: 18%; rating input score 18
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 99.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -32.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 20.2% of revenue deployed · 18% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.