Better Business Bureau of Delaware Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510103861
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- New Castle, DE, USA
- Phone
- 3022215255
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $686,394
- Expenses
- $705,009
- Assets
- $456,656
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
28 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTINE SAUERS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRISTINE SAUERS (PRESIDENT): $171,212 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote the highest ethical relationship between consumer, business and the public through voluntary self-regulation, consumer and business education and service excellence.
What it reported doing in 2025
Bbb's mission is to be the leader in advancing marketplace trust. Bbb accomplishes this mission by - creating a community of trustworthy businesses, setting standards for marketplace trust, encouraging and supporting best practices, celebrating marketplace role models, and denouncing substandard marketplace behavior. Bbb sees trust as a function of two primary factors - integrity and performance. Integrity includes respect, ethics and intent. Performance speaks to a business's track record of delivering results in accordance with bbb standards and/or addressing customer concerns in a timely, satisfactory manner. Bbb ensures that high standards for trust are set and maintained. Bbb exists so consumers and businesses alike have an unbiased source to guide them on matters of trust. Bbb provides educational information and expert advice that is free of charge and easily accessible. Bbb businesses meeting bbb standards are presented to local boards of directors (or designees) for review and acceptance as a bbb accredited business. All bbb accredited businesses have agreed to live up to our standards for trust. Our standards for trust are a comprehensive set of policies, procedures, and best practices focused on how businesses should treat the public, fairly and honestly in all circumstances. Bbb does not compare businesses against each other, but rather evaluates businesses against bbb standards, and bbb standards clearly speak to the character and competence of an organization. Bbb is the resource to turn to for objective, unbiased information on businesses. Bbb's network of national and local bbb operations allows us to monitor and take action on thousands of business issues affecting consumers at any given time. In 2025, the bureau provided 1,403,073 reports to consumers and handled approximately 11,003 complaints.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.7%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.3%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 27 of 27 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $171K · 28 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.