Bethlehem Preschool Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141569614
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Glenmont, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5184638091
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Child Day Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,696,266
- Expenses
- $1,700,066
- Assets
- $842,798
- Liabilities
- $152,510
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mary Morrill (Executive Director)
- Catherine Halayko (Executive Director)
- James A Morrill (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Tara Rinckey (Director): $82,268 total reported compensation
- Mary Morrill (Executive Director): $31,713 total reported compensation
- Catherine Halayko (Executive Director): $24,267 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bethlehem Preschool, Inc. strives to provide excellence in the early care and education field since our founding in 1975. We serve infants through 6 year olds with quality programming on a full-day, year-round basis.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our only program service is to provide child day care and education for children ages six weeks to six years old. We are licensed by the New York State Office of Children and Family Services. Our current license runs through November of 2026. We are licensed to provide care for 90 children on any given day. During 2024-2025 we served approximately 100 families and 115 children. We have six classrooms, each serving a different age. The classrooms provide developmentally appropriate, child-centered activities. Our program includes child-directed and teacher-directed play, breakfast, lunch and afternoon snack, outdoor play on our extensive playground, nap and rest time, and age appropriate educational instruction. We have an excellent reputation in our community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 75
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.3%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 96%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.2%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.3% of revenue deployed · 96% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $82K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.