Bethesda International Ministry Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 861223246
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Naugatuck, CT, USA
- Phone
- 2034667638
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $49,984
- Assets
- $13,761
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GABRIELA GARCIA (PRESIDENT)
- ELVIA REISS (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GABRIELA GARCIA (PRESIDENT)
- ELVIA REISS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- EDUARDO GARCIA (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Bethesda International Ministrys mission is to follow the example of Jesus Christ, Seeking to put Gods love into action by assisting, low-income youth, children and the elderly members of the communities of Columbia, Ecuador, Chile and the USA. We want to contribute to their health and well-being by providing them with resources of nutritional food, clothes, school supplies, books, bibles, shelter and support through health and educational seminars.
What it reported doing in 2024
Programs to alleviate hunger in conjunction with Seventh-day Adventist Church in locally focused community services. These projects brought food, clothing, school supplies, construction, and training to these communities.Assisted in the following communities: Ecuador, Columbia, Chile, and the USA.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 12
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 81.4%; rating input score 81
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -66.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $41K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.