Beth El Hebrew Congregation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
541624821
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2017
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2017
Location
Alexandria, VA, USA
Phone
7039121992
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$98,622
Expenses
$93,017
Assets
$54,820
Liabilities
$4,774

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DENNIS CHAMOT (Vice President)
  • JILL MENDELSON (President)
  • MELONIE BARROWS (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • MELONIE BARROWS (Executive Director): $28,858 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are Beth El, a sacred Jewish community for all who seek connection, meaning, and healing. We are authentic.** Our worship and community life reflect Jewish values in modern times, bringing ancient wisdom into contemporary life. We care for each other.** At Beth El, you’re family. We embrace diversity and support one another through life’s joys and challenges. We welcome everyone.** No matter where you are in your Jewish journey, there’s a place for you at Beth El. Our diverse congregation warmly embraces individuals and households of all backgrounds. You’ll feel at home whether you grew up in a Jewish tradition, chose Judaism as your spiritual journey, or are part of a Jewish partnership.

What it reported doing in 2017

Provide three formerly homeless families the opportunity to work toward self sufficiency. Provide economic stability as well as emotional and life-skills support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 81
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.5%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -14% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -23.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 83.5% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $82K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $29K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.