Beta Theta Pi Fraternity Butler

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
821665949
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
5132732229
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$55,025
Expenses
$49,704
Assets
$46,729
Liabilities
$10,012

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CLAYTON G FORRER (CHAPTER PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN R MCEACHERN (VICE PRESIDENT OF FINANCE)
  • SEAN T SULLIVAN (VICE PRESIDENT OF BROTHERH)
  • AUSTIN G HART (VICE PRESIDENT OF RISK MAN)
  • DANIEL J ALFULTIS (VICE PRESIDENT OF EDUCATIO)
  • EVAN R POUND (VICE PRESIDENT OF RECRUITM)

People named in this filing

  • CLAYTON G FORRER (CHAPTER PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN R MCEACHERN (VICE PRESIDENT OF FINANCE)
  • SEAN T SULLIVAN (VICE PRESIDENT OF BROTHERH)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Local collegiate chapter of beta theta pi franternity. Beta theta pi fraternity promotes and develops intellect and culture.

What it reported doing in 2023

Fraternal, social, brotherhood, and leadership programming for members: put on events and local programming to further the organizations social purpose and provide opportunities to live our core values of mutual aid and assistance, cultivation of the intellect, responsible social conduct, trust, and integrity.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.7%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.