Berks Counseling Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232043478
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Reading, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6103734281
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,494,569
- Expenses
- $13,291,493
- Assets
- $22,972,855
- Liabilities
- $3,142,077
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTINE AXFORD (CEO & PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- GREG LITTLE (CFO): $149,792 total reported compensation
- CHRISTINE AXFORD (CEO & PRESIDENT): $145,432 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Berks counseling center (bcc) is a recovery oriented certified community behavioral health center (ccbhc) with an integrated behavioral and physical health model of service delivery. The center provides a holistic approach to a culturally and economically diverse population for the purpose of achieving a healthy and productive life.
What it reported doing in 2024
Bcc is a recovery oriented integrated community wellness center (icwc) and certified community behavioral health center (ccbhc) with an integrated behavioral and physical health model of service delivery. The center provides a holistic approach to a culturally and economically diverse population for the purpose of promoting a healthy and productive lifestyle. The organization is fully licensed by the commonwealth of Pennsylvania to provide a wide range of addiction and mental health outpatient treatment services.see additional information on schedule o. Berks counseling center provides treatment services to include an integrated physical and behavioral healthcare model of treatment inclusive of outpatient individual, group, and family counseling; medicated assisted treatment for our opioid addicted clients, psychiatric evaluations and medication management, case management, physical health assessment and treatment; wellness programs; and ancillary supportive services to residents of our transitional and permanent housing programs, inclusive of the housing and supportive services afforded inmates re-entering the community from our county jail and/or as a diverse option in lieu of jail. Supportive services, including case management, are provided to high-risk mothers with children as is parenting and other support groups offered at convenient community sites on an as-needed basis. The organization also facilitates a pregnant and parenting teen program, as well as assessment and treatment services for the children, at the berks county intermediate unit and in the various elementary, middle, and high schools of berks county. The inmates of the berks county prison and community re-entry center are also the beneficiaries of drug/alcohol treatment services as is the state and federal correctional system returnees to the community. The goal is to improve health outcomes through onsite primary physical care, care coordination, and nurse/care management, with an emphasis on prevention, recovery, and wellness. As a icwc and a ccbhc, the organization works collaboratively with other county providers of behavioral health treatment services as well as our local hospitals. There is a close partnership with service access management, the county crisis unit, and threshold, who provides psychosocial rehabilitation. Both serve as designated collaborating organizations (dco) with bcc.berks counseling center services the residents of berks county regardless of ability to pay. The organization is a network provider for council on chemical abuse, service access management, health choices, and medicare approved clients. The organization also accepts most third-party insurance payments.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.6%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 87.9%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.4%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.73; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.6% of revenue deployed · 87.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 11 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.9M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.