Berkner Area Band Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 752062192
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Richardson, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9729794890
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Music Groups, Bands, Ensembles
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $332,405
- Expenses
- $348,912
- Assets
- $46,676
- Liabilities
- $26,716
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Steve Tucker (President)
- Marilyn Diaz (Vice President, Chaperoning & Volunteering)
- Sonia Few (Vice President, Chaperoning & Volunteering)
- David Monson (Vice President, Fundraising)
- Lucretia Monson (Vice President, Fundraising)
- Cassie Perez (Vice President, Hospitality, Special Events)
People named in this filing
- Steve Tucker (President)
- Marni Cook (Treasurer)
- Leticia Keister (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Berkner Area Band Club is a nonprofit organizations established exclusively for educational and charitable purposes to: 1.Promote community investment in band programs; 2.Encourage band members and promote enthusiasm and pride in band membership; 3.Coordinate and promote fundraising projects; and 4.Provide additional support for band programs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Private lessons and clinics for band students; professional development for staff to aid the curriculum of three public schools in the Berkner area; participation in local, UIL, band and percussion camps, all-state, all-region, and other music related programs. Scholarship and awards for selected Seniors who excelled in band and will pursue music majors in college. A Scholarship Committee was formed to select and qualify these Seniors. Consistent UIL Division 1 ratings for all 3 schools in the Berkner Learning Community throughout the Concert Band and Marching band seasons.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.8%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 89.5%; rating input score 89; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.57; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 19 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $345K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.