Berkeley Repertory Theatre

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
941679756
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Berkeley, CA, USA
Phone
5106472900
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Theater

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$21,221,432
Expenses
$23,289,718
Assets
$86,521,661
Liabilities
$45,131,256

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

42 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BILL ESPEY (PRESIDENT)
  • SUDHA PENNATHUR (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SHERRY SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE)
  • EMILY SHANKS (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOHANNA PFAELZER (ARTISTIC DIRECTOR): $381,872 total reported compensation
  • TOM PARRISH (MANAGING DIRECTOR): $377,308 total reported compensation
  • ARI LIPSKY (DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $192,480 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Please see schedule o for the complete mission statement.berkeley repertory theatre creates ambitious theatre that entertains and challenges its audiences, provokes civic engagement, and inspires people to experience the world in new and surprising ways. Known for its core values of storytelling, rigor, innovation, equity, discovery, and sustainability, berkeley rep draws theatre artists from around the country and the world to produce an annual seven-play season and up to four additional special event presentations that invite audiences to enjoy an eclectic range of theatrical experiences featuring diverse artistic voices, themes, and perspectives.

What it reported doing in 2024

Berkeley rep school of theatre: marking 40 years of arts education at berkeley rep, in 2024/25, our school of theatre served over 13,000 youth and life-long learners through school of theatre programming. A throughline across our work this year was a focus on deepening connections with and between the communities we serve, growing existing relationships with school partners, connecting young people through storytelling, and building points of connection between our teen leaders and mainstage audience. Through in-school residencies, the school reached over 1,500 students across 41 bay area schools, providing high-quality arts education across the region, including several title 1 schools. Our student matinees welcomed over 1,400 middle and high school students to attend (continued on schedule o) our mainstage productions, augmented with pre-show workshops and post-show conversations with the artists. We hosted our third annual high school theatre festival, in which 115 students from four area high schools received pre-professional training, as well as devised and showcased one-act performances to nearly 250 audience members. Our teen council programs engaged nearly 600 participants, ranging from our teen leadership council's policy and advocacy work to the shepherding of the work of the four teenage playwrights in our young writers of color collective, culminating in a public reading by professional actors. Our next generation fellowship program provided 13 early-career theater professionals with immersive, hands-on training and mentorship over an 11-month pre-professional program. And, nearly 1,500 students of all ages--youth, teen, and adult--explored hands-on creative practice in over 130 unique classes and summer camps offered to the general public.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 91
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.2%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.5%; rating input score 94; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.7%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.72; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.52; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.2% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 29 of 31 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $19.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $382K · 42 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $699K reported
  • Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 21 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.