Berkeley Music Group

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461517597
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Berkeley, CA, USA
Phone
9253541442
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Culture, and Humanities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,753,192
Expenses
$6,556,655
Assets
$4,151,129
Liabilities
$1,636,629

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID M MAYERI (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVID M MAYERI (PRESIDENT): $200,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The berkeley music group was founded in 2012 as a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization to renovate and run the uc theatre taube family music hall in berkeley. The uc theatre is an independent community-minded 1,400 capacity multi-tiered live music venue with youth education programs. Our mission is to present a vibrant and diverse range of live performances to advance the understanding and appreciation of music, culture, and education in the bay area. We provide inclusive, diverse, and culturally rich music programming as well as transformative hands on music business youth education programs. The berkeley music group is dedicated to ensuring that the uc theatre strengthens the bay areas vibrant fabric of nonprofit arts and service organizations.

What it reported doing in 2024

Bmgs concert career pathways youth education program teaches young people ages 17 to 25 the technical, creative, and business aspects of concert and event promotion. Our concert career pathways education program (ccp) seeks to remove the barriers of entry into the music business for underserved communities. This nine month experimental workforce development program develops critical and creative thinking skills necessary to become successful in the 21st-century workplace. Bmgs hands-on work-based learning model is a combination of free workshops and paid internships where young people learn the best practices in essential jobs such as: production manager, event coordinator, stage manager, floor manager, box office operations, bar operations, talent buying, event budgeting, traditional marketing, social media marketing, promotions, community development, and more. Bmg offers these programs to youth attending local schools and underserved youth through partnerships with established nonprofit community organizations, and the general public. Bmgs ccp grads come from a diverse range of backgrounds; 50% are young women, 70% are people of color, over half are from low-income households. 80% of program graduates have been successfully placed in jobs, and most of them live up and down the hwy 80 corridor from san pablo to san leandro. In order to ensure that the program is accessible to young people for underserved communities, bmg formed an educational advisory committee, which is comprised of numerous nonprofit youth development organizations who work in these communities. Despite the wealth in the bay area, teenagers and young adults, particularly low-income youth of color, struggle to find educational opportunities that lead to living wage jobs. Ccp provides hands-on job experiences, fostering the understanding of work as an integral and satisfying aspect of life, and connecting youth passionate about music business to a field in which there are current job opportunities and career ladders. Now more than ever, removing the barriers to entry in the workforce for people of color and the lgbtq community is critical to embrace and support. In general, music industry management programs, like many industries in the united states, lack equity, diversity, and inclusion. The uc theatre believes that bringing together young leaders from a variety of backgrounds with diverse perspectives will help create a more equitable and diverse industry and provide a space for underserved youth to have their voices heard by their peers, some of whom come from more privileged backgrounds, providing exposure to and immersion in diverse voices and ideas. This unique management program supports up and coming leaders of the bay area that hold promise for reimagining the music industry in ways that advance intergenerational and multicultural leadership, inclusion and equity.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 87
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 90.4%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.39; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $5.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $200K · 7 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.