Berkeley County Foundation for Education

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
571111408
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Moncks Corner, SC, USA
Phone
8435092266
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$40,576
Expenses
$18,527
Assets
$304,394

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • KAYE MYERS (CHAIRMAN)
  • JOHN O WILLIAMS II (SECRETARY)
  • CAROLYN WEST (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of berkeley county foundation for education - in partnership with individuals, businesses and the school district - is to provide financial resources for the pursuit of educational excellence and innovation.

What it reported doing in 2024

The berkeley county foundation for education is an all volunteer, non- profit organization, whose goal is the improvement of education at all levels. Its aim is to provide additional support, both finanical and non- financial, to the public school system in the county by means of: (1) providing additional funding for educational projects that exceed the school district's operating budget and other funding; (2) through the use of grants and awards, encourage schools, teachers, and students towards quality educational programs; (3) by fostering a positive community perception of education in the county; and (4) by providing an occasional scholarship to college students from this county. There are approximately 29,600 students in berkeley county in grades k-12, with 40 schools and 2,257 teachers that stand to benefit from this organization's efforts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 54.3%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.43; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.