Berkeley-Albany YMCA Teen Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271386743
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- Oakland, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5105494522
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Centers, Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,614,201
- Expenses
- $282,903
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To hold title to, remodel and improve, and to lease to the berkeley young men's christian association, a California nonprofit corporation ("ymca"), a building to be used by the ymca and by the organization as a teen center, providing organizational support for the ymca, and administrative offices for the ymca and the organization.
What it reported doing in 2016
TO HOLD TITLE TO, REMODEL AND IMPROVE, AND TO LEASE TO THE BERKELEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION ("YMCA"), A BUILDING TO BE USED BY THE YMCA AND BY THE ORGANIZATION AS A TEEN CENTER, PROVIDING EDUCATIONAL, EMPLOYMENT AND LEADERSHIP PROGRAMS PRIMARILY FOR TEENS (AGES 12-19) AND OTHER YOUTH, AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES FOR THE YMCA AND THE ORGANIZATION. In December 2009, the Association arranged New Market Tax Credit ("NMTC") financing as partial funding to renovate the property ("Teen Center" building) gifted to the Association by PG&E. Under the NMTC program, banks and other qualifying institutions make "qualified equity investments" ("QEI") in Community Development Entities ("CDEs") that have been certified and granted allocations by the CDFI of federal income tax credits. In connection with the Teen Center Inc. project located at 2111 Martin Luther King Jr. Way ("Teen Center Property"), Wachovia Community Development Enterprise XIX ("Wachovia CDE"), a single purpose CDE certified by the CDFI made a senior loan in the amount of $6,825,000 (Loan A) and a subordinate loan in the amount of $2,675,000 (Loan B) to the YMCA of the Central Bay Area Teen Center, Inc., a single member limited liability company formed by the Association for this purpose. Funding for the Teen Center loans was provided by a $6,825,000 QEI made by Investment Fund LLC ("Investment Fund") to Wachovia CDE. Investment Fund LLC obtained the funds to make the QEI via a $6,825,000 secured loan by YMCA of the Central Bay Area and funding provided via a net equity investment in the amount of $2,675,000 by a tax credit investor. A portion of the proceeds of both Loan A and Loan B were used to acquire the Teen Center Property from the Association. The balance of the funds was used to renovate and improve the Teen Center Property. At the end of the seven-year Compliance Period, the tax credit investor may put its interest in the Investment Fund to the Association, at which time the Association will have the right (call option) to liquidate the Investment Fund's equity interest in the CDE and thereby acquire Loan A and Loan B from the CDE. YMCA of the Central Bay Area, serving as the Leverage Lender, loaned $6,825,000 to Investment Fund. The loan proceeds were combined with $2,675,000 contributed to the Investment Fund by an equity investor and permitted Investment Fund to make an aggregate QEI in Wachovia CDE of $9,500,000. The seven-year Compliance Period ended in December 2016 and the Organization exercised its call option, thereby liquidating the Investment Fund's equity interest in the CDE and acquiring loan A and loan B from the CDE. These loans were subsequently forgiven and net revenue in the amount of $2,674,000 was recognized from this transaction. THE ORGANIZATION TRANSFERRED ALL ITS ASSETS TO YMCA OF THE CENTRAL BAY AREA AND CEASED CONDUCTING BUSINESS BY END OF THE YEAR.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 35
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 2.9%; rating input score 3
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 97.1%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 31.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 69.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 2.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $283K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $351K · 6 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.