Bering Sea Pot Cod Cooperative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461055515
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Clackamas, OR, USA
Phone
6024517752
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$64,152
Assets
$67,955
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DENNIS DEAVER (PRESIDENT)
  • SCOTT CAMPBELL JR (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CRAIG LOWENBERG (MANAGER)
  • DENNIS DEAVER (PRESIDENT)
  • SCOTT CAMPBELL JR (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the bering sea pot cod cooperative is to promote, foster, and encourage the orderly and efficient harvest of pacific cod using pot gear in the waters of the bering sea and aleutian islands. Through active participation in research, regulation, and continuous improvement of "best fishing practices" the bering sea pot cod cooperative seeks to ensure the fishery remains healthy and sustainable for future generations.

What it reported doing in 2024

Actively participating in research, regulation, and continuous improvement of "best fishing practices," the bering sea pot cod cooperative seeks to ensure the fishery remains healthy and sustainable for future generations. Representatives attended the north pacific fishery management council, Alaska board of fisheries meetings, and Alaska business officials meetings to report relevant issues. Members have been kept apprised of activity and new developments via email and virtual meetings.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 77.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.