Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the USA Bryan Elks Lodge 859 Bpoe

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
741324691
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Bryan, TX, USA
Phone
9798462096
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$76,270
Expenses
$51,862
Assets
$64,544
Liabilities
$3,440

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

People named in this filing

  • LARRY BAUGHMAN (EXALTED LEADER)
  • BECKY MARTINEZ (LEADING KNIGHT)
  • CYNTHIA SOLIS (LOYAL KNIGHT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To carry on fraternal activities under the lodge system, the net income of which is used exclusively for benevolent and charitable purposes. This is accomplished thrugh youth activities, drug awareness, youth scholarship, assistance to local charities, veteran programs, american citizenship and civics, and support to state major projects.

What it reported doing in 2021

Accomplishments: to carry on fraternal activities under the lodge system, the net income of which is used exclusively for benevolent and charitable purposes. This is accmplished through youth activities, drug awareness, yuth scholarship, assistance to local charities, veteran programs, american citizenship and civics, and to state major projects

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 62% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 5
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 4.8%; rating input score 5
  • Program expense ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 5

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 32%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 4.8% of revenue deployed · 5.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.