Benedict Haven Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
593492167
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2018
Location
St Petersburg, FL, USA
Phone
7278931314
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Residential Mental Health Treatment

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$-134,590
Expenses
$252,505
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FRANK V MURPHY (PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN DUFEK (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARK DUFVA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARK DUFVA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $136,893 total reported compensation
  • JAMES WAYNE (DIRECTOR): $91,553 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide full-time permanent residential mental health care to adults

What it reported doing in 2018

Benedict haven offers a full continuum of care and support services that are consistent with our licensing. Our staff is comprised of a program manager, an activities director, a registered nurse, a psychologist and residential caregivers - each with the skills and commitment necessary to caringly work with the mentally ill. Our service program includes 24/7 staff supervision, medication monitoring, nutritious meals and snacks, transportation, extensive in-house day treatment and activities programs, case management, activities of daily living skills(adl), training, daily outings and weekly special events. In addition to having their own private rooms, residents enjoy the use of our spacious great room, computer room, and meticulously maintained patio and lush garden areas. Our high staff-to-resident ratio promotes greater focus and more intimate care consistently resulting in positive outcomes including higher levels of resident development and low recidivism rates.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 86.4%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -287.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.6%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -20.9% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $218K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $137K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.