Bend FFA Alumni

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
481282854
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Bend, OR, USA
Phone
2063902387
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Husbandry

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$65,701
Expenses
$46,507
Assets
$41,647

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Cristy Ouellette (President)
  • Kyndel Lumley (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Cristy Ouellette (President)
  • Amy Tye (Treasurer)
  • Joy Walker (Co Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are a group of parents and community members who support the students and Bend FFA Chapter at Mountain View High School. We provide scholarships and grants directly to students and to the School Chapter as well to help fund school programs. We also provide meals and transportation for local events, purchase equipment and supplies for the students and teachers, and volunteer our time as needed to support the High School FFA Chapter.

What it reported doing in 2024

We donated funds to the Bend FFA Chapter for the students to use to attend FFA Competitions and conventions throughout the school year, as well as for the Chapter to purchase supplies as needed to support the programs offered to the kids. This mostly benefits the most active 50 FFA members (students), however there are about 200 total members between all agricultural classes and even the slightly active kids reap the benefits of the funds donated.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 91% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.1%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 94%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 29.2%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 58.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 39% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 59.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.1% of revenue deployed · 94% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $44K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.