Bemidji State University Alumni Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411283982
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Bemidji, MN, USA
- Phone
- 2187553989
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alumni Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $51,227
- Expenses
- $43,417
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BENJAMIN MCANINCH (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN ARMBRUST (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BENJAMIN MCANINCH (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN ARMBRUST (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ELISE DURBIN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The alumni association believes in the value of education and lifelong connections among the alumni with bemidji state university. It aims to provide opportunities to strenghten relationships that mutually benefit the alumni and university. The alumni association's current goals include building and maintaining programs and services that broaden active alumni participation, improve communications and build relationships with current students.
What it reported doing in 2015
Alumni funds - undesignated: disbursements for support of misc. Programs involving academic life at bsu, alumni recognition, and other promotional activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.1%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 57.9%; rating input score 58
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.2%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -31.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -21% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -23.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.1% of revenue deployed · 57.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $25K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.