Beloit Art Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
392040460
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Beloit, WI, USA
Phone
6083139083
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$145,486
Expenses
$88,627
Assets
$330,622
Liabilities
$67,205

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dawn Stadelman (President)
  • Cassie Steffek (Vice President/Gallery Manager)

People named in this filing

  • Lisa Reshkus (Gallery Manager)
  • Ben Henthorn (Board Member)
  • Nancy Clark-Mather (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide resources to help emerging artists, offer community education & cultural events, and expand the Arts Center theme.

What it reported doing in 2025

Rental of studio space to artist, providing a centralizedand supportive environment for artist to work andcollarberate as well as exhibit and sell art.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.1%; rating input score 52
  • Program expense ratio: 81.2%; rating input score 81

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39.1%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.73; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.3%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 26.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.1% of revenue deployed · 81.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $72K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.