Bellflower Center for Prevention Of

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
341304237
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990 2010
Location
Cleveland, OH, USA
Phone
2162292420
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Child Abuse, Prevention

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$754,300
Expenses
$831,499
Assets
$168,445
Liabilities
$28,712

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

37 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Bellflower center for prevention of child abuse prevents child abuse and neglect by breaking the cycle of child abuse in all its forms through clinical treatment and education. Programs include: individual counseling; child therapy groups; adult survivors groups; 24-hour family helpline; kinship care home visiting program; teen parent groups; personal safety skills for children; parent education & training.

What it reported doing in 2010

All programs are classified under a combined service called counseling. This includes diagnostic assessment which is provided as an initial evaluation and planning component for all agency mental health programs. All assessments are done on a face-to-face basis. Individual counseling provides therapy for children and adults who are dealing with consequences of child abuse and neglect. Individual counseling consist of a series of time-limited, structured, face-to-face sessions that work toward the attainment of goals. Group services include the teen parent group, the children's treatment group and the adult survivors groups. The teen parent group is a therapeutic prgram providing a setting in which teens address needs which have been identified in the diagnostic assessment and defined as goals in the individualized service plan (isp). Needs may include, but are not limited to those associated with the struggles of balancing teen parenthood with the normal challenges and stresses of adolescense. In addition to development stresses, many of the group participants are themselves, survivors of abuse and/or neglect. The program is availabe to pregnant and parenting teens, ages 12 through 19, who meet admission criteria. The children's treatment group is for children who have been sexually abused, neglected or subjected to extreme trauma. The adult survivors groups are designed to meet the treatment needs of adult survivors of emotional, physical and/or sexual abuse and neglect. The personal safety skills training for children program is a classroom program designed to keep children safe, particularly from sexual abuse, by empowering them with the knowledge that they can say "no" to an adult or an older child teaching them how to seek help when they have a problem or concern. The overall goal of the program is to enhance the awareness of abuse issues and to increase parents', teachers' and children's skills to ensure prevention and reduction of children's risk from abuse. The program includes three one-half hour sessions for children and one hour session for the teachers. Children receive a booklet reviewing the personal safety curriculum to reinforce the program. Parents are encouraged to read and discuss the booklet with their children. Teachers receive handouts with information on child abuse recognition and appropriate action to take when abuse is suspected.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.3%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 37 of 37 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $624K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $69K · 37 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.