Bellevue Literary Press Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824035270
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9178323606
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Printing, Publishing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $701,783
- Expenses
- $543,987
- Assets
- $557,981
- Liabilities
- $60,860
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GLORIA JACOBS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ERIKA GOLDMAN (PUBLISHER/EDITORIAL DIRECTOR): $125,508 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bellevue literary press is devoted to publishing literary fiction and nonfiction at the intersection of the arts and sciences because we believe that science and the humanities are natural companions for understanding the human experience.
What it reported doing in 2025
Bellevue literary press publishes 6-8 books a year on average, with print runs of anywhere from 1,500-10,000 copies, including reprints of earlier-published titles as needed, and in any given year are working on books that will be published in future years. We use several methods to track the effectiveness of each activity. Overall sales, awards, and review coverage are key measures of success. For academic outreach, we monitor course adoptions, desk and examination copy requests, feedback from students and instructors, and reading group and curriculum guide downloads. Library sales, transacted primarily via the wholesaler baker & taylor and ebook vendors, are tracked during the project period. We also monitor sales for each title before and after specific marketing and promotional initiatives, including the number of digital review copies downloaded through edelweiss and all of the responses (preorders, reviews, libraryreads and indie next nominations, etc.) that result from those downloads.we use google analytics to measure engagement with our website and enewsletter campaigns. We measure social media engagement across all of our platforms: facebook, twitter, librarything, goodreads, youtube, and instagram.the beneficiaries are our readers and authors. We publish and promote to the widest possible audience books by both emerging and returning authors of literary fiction and creative, interdisciplinary nonfiction.literature's impact, like empathy, may be difficult to quantify; however, our past successes exemplify what our commitment to fostering and amplifying our writers' singular voices can bring them and their readers. When paul harding's debut novel, tinkers, became the first independently published pulitzer prize-winning work of fiction in over three decades, it delighted readers, invigorated the independent publishing community, and inspired writers everywhere. The lives they left behind by darby penney and peter stastny gave rise to a grassroots campaign to commemorate patients who had been buried in unmarked graves on the grounds of a psychiatric hospital. Helen benedict's novel wolf season was chosen for Kansas city's book club, which hosted public discussions with veterans about the effects of war. We are privileged to witness our mission's power to encourage writers, engage a diverse readership, inform young minds, and inspire courageous acts of citizenship.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 69.6%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.96 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.5%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.1%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69% of revenue deployed · 69.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $379K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $126K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.