Bella Vista Jr. Broncos
Legal name: Bella Vista Jr Broncos
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800785529
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Fair Oaks, CA, US
- Phone
- 9163422946
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Football
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $261,627
- Expenses
- $207,652
- Assets
- $84,555
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RACHEL PAGANO (President)
People named in this filing
- HILARY JOHNSON (MERCHANDISE)
- BRYAN VELASQUEZ (EQUIP MGR)
- KOJI KUMPULAINIEN (Media)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote a positive environment in competitive youth tackle football and cheerleading.
What it reported doing in 2025
Football program - our regular season football program is for participants ages 6-14. Typically, more than one hundred (100) players compete in full contact football. Players learn teamwork, self-awareness, community activism, and pride in achievement. Cheer program - the cheerleading program serves as a positive environment for children ages 5-14. Typically, more than seventy (70) kids participate in learning cheerleading and dance routines that teach teamwork, self-awareness, community activism and pride in achievement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 54
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.2%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 96%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.6%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 76.2% of revenue deployed · 96% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 11 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $199K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.