Belknap County Sportsmens Assoc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020364595
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Laconia, NH, USA
Phone
6035203608
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$75,332
Expenses
$92,952
Assets
$394,550
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Richard Grenier (President)
  • Wes Williams (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Richard Grenier (President)
  • Wes Williams (Vice President)
  • Tarra Sorell (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The protection and promotion of all fish and game interests with specific emphasis on the education of the general public and school children in particular as to the benefits and gains to society in the ecosystem and to foster a strict adherence to the state of NH Fish and Game laws; and to acquire by purchase, lease or otherwise, real or personal property for the purpose of carrying on the above.

What it reported doing in 2025

Through various fundraising activities, the Sportmens Club educates and provides guidance to the general public and children as to the benefits of protecting fish and game and to the importance of adhering to the NH Fish and Game laws. Members and guest speakers assist in these activities. Fun activities such as game dinners, gaming and fishing derbys are held every year to foster the clubs purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 11
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 14.5%; rating input score 14
  • Program expense ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 6

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -23.4%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.24; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 14.5% of revenue deployed · 6.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.