Bel Air High School Athletic Booster Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
471718197
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Bel Air, MD, USA
Phone
4106386400
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$50,397
Expenses
$42,452
Assets
$95,722

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kayla Lochary (President)
  • Dawn Harman (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Kayla Lochary (President)
  • Dawn Harman (Vice President)
  • Amy Sergeant (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Bel Air High School Athletic Booster Club is a group comprised of parents, students, athletes, faculty, staff, the athletic director, and coaches whose mission is to provide support to all Bel Air High School students, athletes, coaches, administration, and athletic programs. We do this through active volunteer participation and by working closely with the athletic department and school administration. Fundraising efforts such as membership drives, concession sales, and special events enable the boosters to fund scholarships to graduating seniors and fund supplementary support to all Bel Air High School athletic teams. The Bel Air High School Athletic Booster Club fosters athletic and academic excellence, promotes sportsmanship, endorses Bobcat spirit, and promotes community leadership to shape the youth for our future.

What it reported doing in 2024

During the year ended June 30, 2025, the Bel Air High School Athletic Boosters, Inc. provided team uniforms, specific team requests as well as upkeep of the team equipment. They also paid nine $500 scholarships to the athletes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 80% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45.2%; rating input score 45
  • Program expense ratio: 53.6%; rating input score 54

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.8%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.25; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 45.2% of revenue deployed · 53.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.