Beit HaSha'ar Messianic Fellowship
Legal name: Beit Hashaar Messianic Fellowship Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474358598
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2022
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Manchester, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7068770453
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Judaism
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $69,786
- Expenses
- $62,376
- Assets
- $58,625
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- Gregory Lehtimaki (Rabbi)
- Randy Siers (Elder (Trustee))
- Shane Somonski (Elder (Trustee))
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Beit HaSha’ar Messianic Fellowship provides a place of worship, synagogue/ministry, and community focused on Torah and Judaism centered on Yeshua (the Messiah of Yisra’el), serving both Jewish people and Gentiles and inviting others to join fellowship, worship, and serve the King. Does something seem incomplete in your faith and practice? Come and join us for our next Shabbat service! Our Mission The vision and mission of Beit HaSha’ar Messianic Fellowship is first and foremost to provide a meeting place for like-minded believers to come together to worship The God of Yisra'el and to share fellowship with one another. We will provide a synagogue, ministry, and community where our Jewish brothers and sisters can come and practice a life of Torah and Judaism centered on the Messiah of Yisra'el; Yeshua. Thus, it will be our goal to foster a Hebraic culture that provides a combination of...
What it reported doing in 2022
Conducted religious services and religious education. Held religious events and festivals for congregational members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.6%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.