Being Wholistic Collective

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
334861055
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Carslbad, CA, USA
Phone
9099574655
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,776
Expenses
$17,176
Assets
$2,600

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VANESSA-GISSELE HOLLIMAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • VANESSA-GISSELE HOLLIMAN (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific purpose of this corporation is to empower trauma navigators with resilience skills, conscious community and holistic and spiritually- integrated practices to reclaim their voice, power, and sense of self.

What it reported doing in 2025

Trauma-informed therapy services - the organization provided individual therapy and counseling services to trauma survivors in California, utilizing holistic and spiritually-integrated therapeutic approaches. Services included evidence-based trauma treatment, resilience-building techniques, and community support to help clients reclaim their sense of self and personal agency. During the organization's first year of operations (april 25 - december 31, 2025), the organization served 11 individual clients and 2 couples through approximately 50 hours of individual and couples therapy sessions. Additionally, the organization facilitated 8 group therapy sessions (75 minutes each) and conducted 4 community education events to promote trauma awareness and healing resources. All services were provided in accordance with California licensing requirements and the organization's mission to empower trauma navigators with healing resources. Expenses: 17,176

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.9%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.1%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.8%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $17K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.