Behind the Book

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320086097
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, US
Phone
(212) 222-3627
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,171,530
Expenses
$1,147,642
Assets
$511,395
Liabilities
$177,501

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PHILLIP ANDERSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ROBIN CANTER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREW FRANK TO 102124 (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ANMARIE PAUL AS OF 102224 (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDREW FRANK TO 102124 (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $149,760 total reported compensation
  • ANMARIE PAUL AS OF 102224 (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $136,929 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Behind the Book's mission is to inspire young people to cultivate their vast potential through programs centered on diverse books and authors.

What it reported doing in 2024

Behind the book (btb) delivers multi-disciplinary, culturally responsive literacy programs to schools in low-income neighborhoods in nyc in order to motivate students to become avid and proficient readers and writers.btb works exclusively in pre-k through 12 grade classrooms in title 1 public schools where on average 89% of the students qualify for free lunch. 61% identify as latinx, 33% as black, 4% as white or other and 2% as asian american.the programs feature an 'anchor text selected from a curated book list and consist of 6-8 workshops that meet nyc public schools learning standards. During the 2024-2025 school year, 88% of the authors and 96% of the main characters of the books selected were bipoc or otherwise diverse, critical in fostering the participating students' intrinsic motivation to read and write. Program activities include author workshops, writing workshops, drama activities, art projects, and field trips. Many programs conclude with a professionally designed anthology of students' writing and art, making them published authors and illustrators. Programs are customized for each classroom by a btb curriculum developer and program facilitator with input from the partnering classroom teachers.during the fy2025, (the 2024-2025 school year), btb delivered 51 programs at 20 schools. (30% stem, 30% special education, 31% english language learners) consisting of 383 workshops. We served 1184 students. 14 of the 51 programs culminated in the publication of 9 anthologies of student work, making 325 students published authors and illustrators. The majority of students reported in their post-program self-assessments that they would choose another book to read, would like to participate in another btb project, are more interested in reading and writing, feel their reading has improved, and feel their writing has improved.btb evaluates its work based on the change in students' intrinsic (internal) motivation to read and write, which is critical for their overall school success. The evaluation survey is based on decades of research on the role of intrinsic motivation in learning success.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.2%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 59.4%; rating input score 59
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.79 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 25%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 59.2% of revenue deployed · 59.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $682K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 22 people listed
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.