Behavioral Healthcare Management Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208385581
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Merrillville, IN, USA
Phone
2197571904
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$111,672
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Barbara Scott (Director)
  • Bob Siegmann (Director)
  • Paul Wilson (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Previously formed to coordinate and manage behavioral health services. With the current environment and initiatives, there is no distinct reason for BHMI to operate. Activities have been suspended until significant challenges or opportunities arise in the future.

What it reported doing in 2016

Behavioral Healthcare Management, Inc. BHMI was created on behalf of its Indiana Community Mental Health Center Corporate Members as a vehicle to work to build mutually beneficial partnerships with Indiana Medicaid Care Management Organizations CMOs and Managed Care Organizations MCOs. BHMI has focused on two related priorities. The first was to find ways to partner with CMOs or MCOs to achieve reductions in administrative overhead expenses for providers that could also benefit CMO or MCO partners. For CMHC providers who had historically served large numbers of Medicaid Members, the rapid implementation of three separate managed Medicaid programs with seven contracted CMO or MCO vendors resulted in a significant increase in providers administrative overhead expense with no increase in funding to offset those additional expenses. The second BHMI priority has been to find ways for BHMI Members to work with CMOs and MCOs in addressing high-priority Office of Medicaid Policy and Planning OMPP initiatives to improve efficacy of services. Each Indiana CMHC was required

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Affiliate network. The nonprofit sent 81% of its reported program spending through affiliated organizations.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 96.4%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 141.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2015 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.