Behavioral Health Association of Nevada

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
932868247
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Reno, NV, USA
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital

Reported finances

Revenue
$144,514
Expenses
$112,310
Assets
$69,535

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Steve Shell (Executive Director)
  • Ester Quilici (Board President)

People named in this filing

  • Steve Shell (Executive Director)
  • Ester Quilici (Board President)
  • David Robeck (Board Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Behavioral Health Association of Nevada mission is to promote statewide collaboration among behavioral health professionals and allies through active engagement in policy development and communications strategies to increase focus on prevention and improve accessibility and sustainability of treatment and recovery options for all Nevada residents.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Behavioral Health Association of Nevada BHAN joined the National Council for Mental Wellbeing in Washington D.C. as a 100% statewide association member in order for the National Councils extensive resources to be available to all of BHANs existing and potential members. Valuable information regarding behavioral health policies and funding has been obtained through National Council trainings newsletters and monthly meetings with other state associations and communicated to BHAN membership.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.5%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.3%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 182.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 89% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 60.3% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.5% of revenue deployed · 90.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $102K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.