Beechwood Continuing Care Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 161319252
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Getzville, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7168107323
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,641,744
- Expenses
- $3,463,137
- Assets
- $1,190,644
- Liabilities
- $624,264
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIEL O'NEILL (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DANIEL O'NEILL (PRESIDENT/CEO): $295,016 total reported compensation
- KRISTIN M ANDERSON (VP OF FINANCE/CFO): $241,513 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support the establishment and operations through raising donations for and acting as the management company of asbury pointe, inc., beechwood health care center, inc., inc., ken-ton presbyterian village hdfc, inc., and presbyterian village at north church, inc; which include residential health care facilities, housing for aging and disabled (subsidized and non-subsidized) and other services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Supported the establishment and operations and acted as the management company of asbury pointe, inc., beechwood health care center, inc., ken-ton presbyterian village hdfc, inc., and presbyterian village at north church, inc; which include residential health care facilities, housing for aging and disabled (subsidized and non-subsidized) and other services. Also included are revenue and expenses from ken-ton enriched housing, llc, (a disregarded entity), which provides support services to eligible residents who are 65 years fo age or older, and reside at ken-ton presbyterian village.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 12
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 13%; rating input score 13
- Program expense ratio: 13.7%; rating input score 14
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.9%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.52; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.5%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 29.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 13% of revenue deployed · 13.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $476K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $295K · 13 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 13/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.