Bedford Christian Free Clinic Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541630812
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Bedford, VA, USA
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,689
- Expenses
- $72,539
- Assets
- $102,551
- Liabilities
- $1,173
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Laura Gately MD (Vice President & Bd Mem)
- Laura Hueber (President & Bd Mem)
- Donald Creaighead (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Rev Laura L Carey (Board Member)
- Laura Gately MD (Vice President & Bd Mem)
- Marge Rojewski (Secretary & Bd Mem)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Medical & Pharmacy
What it reported doing in 2020
Pharmacy - provide medications and prescription payments to help eligible patients. The in-house pharmacy dispensed 13 prescriptions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 30
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 45.5%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 6
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -429.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 57%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.1% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 45.5% of revenue deployed · 6.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.