Beaverbrook Step Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042518911
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Watertown, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6179261113
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $30,084,785
- Expenses
- $28,875,351
- Assets
- $22,020,393
- Liabilities
- $7,523,198
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STANLEY KRUSZEWSKI (PRESIDENT)
- SHIRLEE PURCELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- VIRGINIA A CONNOLLY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- VIRGINIA A CONNOLLY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $174,732 total reported compensation
- JESSICA A KIRWAN (SENIOR DIRECTOR): $162,435 total reported compensation
- JOHN SANNELLA (INTERIM CFO): $151,489 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Beaverbrook step, inc. Is a private, not-for-profit organization which provides residential, day and support services to adults with developmental and intellectual disabilities in eastern Massachusetts. The organization assists with the access, training and opportunities necessary to fully experience the benefits of community living. The organization strives to enhance the quality of life of individuals, while also fulfilling our responsibility to help our communities understand and appreciate the talents of all of its members.
What it reported doing in 2024
Residential services: beaverbrook step supported over 100 individuals enabling training, education, skill building, medical and psychiatric treatment, recreation, relationship building and community integration in over 25 settings. Additionally, beaverbrook step ensured that individuals were able to participate in their communities as valued members. The organization maintained attractive and affordable homes, employed a well-skilled staff and conducted itself in responsible, creative ways.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.3%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.3% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $25.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $175K · 18 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.