Beauty from Ashes
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 862251608
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8013960089
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Counseling, Support Groups
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $172,091
- Expenses
- $99,516
- Assets
- $107,560
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Debby Mylar (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Beverly Verano (Chair - Board of Directors)
- Steven Clark (Director)
- Bryant Strain (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Beauty From Ashes Ministries exists to bring the redemptive hope of the gospel to individuals experiencing domestic oppression and abuse by providing survivor support services, advocacy, education, and community training. The organization supports survivors through practical needs assistance, support groups, emergency housing, safety planning, and referrals to community resources, while also equipping churches and local organizations through training and education to recognize and appropriately respond to domestic abuse.
What it reported doing in 2025
Survivor care: Beauty From Ashes served 85 survivors in 2025 compared to 45 survivors in 2024. Our support group attendance doubled from 2024 (total attendance count 202) to 2025 (total attendance count 460). We provided housing for 4 survivor families (only 1 in 2024), and we provided furniture to 2 families needing to start over, which we had never done before. We provided a stable Christmas for 20 survivor families through donations of Christmas gifts and food.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.8%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.2%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 49.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $100K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.