Beautiful Mb Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462608065
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2014
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Phone
8582709900
Rating
50
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$82,914
Expenses
$83,487
Assets
$1,176
Liabilities
$996

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GINA CHAMPION-CAIN (President)
  • CRIS TORRES (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • GINA CHAMPION-CAIN (President)
  • JOHN VALLAS (Chairman)
  • CRIS TORRES (CEO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Beautiful mb inc is a community organization for the beautification of mission beach, ca. The organization is dedicated to improvement and enhancement projects to benefit the community of mission beach.

What it reported doing in 2017

Formation of community benefits district. The formation of the community benefits district will enable to organization to further it's purpose in the improvement and beautfification of mission beach. The potential projects and services consist of landscape, hardscape and open space maintenance, community identification and signage and seasonal decoration projects.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 29
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28.9%; rating input score 29
  • Program expense ratio: 28.7%; rating input score 29

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.85; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 54.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.1% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 22.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 28.9% of revenue deployed · 28.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $24K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.