Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 570296095
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Beaufort, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8435258525
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $677,180
- Expenses
- $500,541
- Assets
- $572,765
- Liabilities
- $217,026
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MEGAN MORRIS (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MEGAN MORRIS (PRESIDENT & CEO): $98,623 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to promote economic prosperity to enhance the well-being of everyone in our region. We envision a thriving region based on a resilient economy, today and for future generations. The chamber is an independent network of local leaders representing business of every size and sector, advocating for a strong business climate and a prosperous future for the beaufort region, and united by the belief that successful businesses are the foundation of a thriving community. Our values include integrity, collaboration, inclusion, and service. Our region includes beaufort, port royal, lady's island, burton, sheldon, yemassee, st. Helena island, and the sea islands.
What it reported doing in 2024
The chamber exists to promote economic prosperity to enhance the well-being of everyone in our region by:1) supporting local businesses by providing advocacy, information, and connections, to help members be successful and profitable: a) advocacy: i) actionable public policy agenda to improve the region's business climate. Ii) consistent dialog with local, state, and federal elected officials to advocate for businesses. B) information: i) multichannel communications with curated news, perspectives, resources, and promotion opportunities. Ii) seminars with innovative thinkers and best practice leaders. C) connections: i) frequent, well-organized opportunities to interact with other business leaders. Ii) unique ways to reach target customers.2) growing the economy by working with partners to promote growing economic sectors and strengthen existing economic pillars such as defense and tourism: a) partnerships: i) establish partnerships with allied organizations working to promote economic growth. Ii) use advocacy, convening, and communication strengths to advance partner's missions. B) sectors: i) convene member businesses by economic sector to assess needs and explore opportunities. Ii) organize work groups and share economic/employment data to advance key sectors. C) military: i) advocate for policies, programs, and investments needed to secure the region's existing military missions. Ii) identify and promote opportunities to attract complementary missions by building on current assets. D) key economic sectors: i) military/defense ii) hospitality iii)real estate iv) manufacturing v) health care vi) technology3) building leadership capacity by mobilizing the board, conducting research, leveraging communications and programs, and growing the membership to enhance the chamber's influence and capacity: a) vision: i) use convening power of the chamber board to engage with regional leaders from other sectors. Ii) engage chamber members in future visioning through events and surveys. B) insight: i) track and report on key regional economic, workforce, and demographic data. Ii) publish reports, release op-eds, and offer commentary about significant regional issues. C) organization: i) grow membership and revenue by attracting new members and upgrade existing members. Ii) deepen member engagement in strategic work areas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.1%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.14; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.7%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $99K · 24 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.