Beaufort-Jasper-Hampton Comprehensive Health Services, Inc.
Legal name: Beaufort-jasper-hampton Comprehensive Health Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 570523586
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2023
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Okatie, SC, US
- Phone
- 843-987-7400
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $33,212,408
- Expenses
- $33,004,273
- Assets
- $28,169,268
- Liabilities
- $4,114,579
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FAITH POLKEY (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- OCTAVIO CABRERA (OBGYN): $356,339 total reported compensation
- KEVIN J BLAU (PHYSICIAN): $342,246 total reported compensation
- FAITH POLKEY (CEO): $341,681 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Mission of Beaufort Jasper Comprehensive Health Services, Inc. is to provide quality, affordable, accessible and comprehensive health care services to the South Carolina Lowcountry Community.
What it reported doing in 2023
Beaufort jasperhampton comprehensive health services, inc. Provided primary health care to approximately 18,210 patients during the fiscal year ended 5/31/24.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.6%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 72.8%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.6%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 15 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 72.6% of revenue deployed · 72.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $24M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $356K · 19 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.1M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.