Bears Football Club of Monument Colorado
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273419980
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Monument, CO, USA
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $71,734
- Expenses
- $96,997
- Assets
- $121,153
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mary Jane Bone (President)
- Mary Oringdolph (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Mary Jane Bone (President)
- Mary Oringdolph (Vice President)
- Stacey Withrow (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bears Football Club of Monument exists to supplement the needs of the Palmer Ridge Football Team at Palmer Ridge High School in Monument Colorado as well as youth football programs in the Monument area. We do this by providing safety equipment travel accommodations nutrition and other items needed to support the team.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organizations provision of a nutritious meal before each game serves a dual purpose. Firstly it ensures that student athletes receive the essential game day nutrition they need to perform at their best thereby supporting and safeguarding their well-being. Secondly this practice fosters a sense of community and unity among team members enhancing team spirit and camaraderie. The team meals benefited approximately 90 players and 20 coaches and trainers each week.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.8%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 71.6%; rating input score 72
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -35.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.8% of revenue deployed · 71.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 10 filed program accomplishments · $69K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.