Bearkat Parent Teacher Organization
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822869611
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Pearland, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2812453660
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,537
- Expenses
- $35,742
- Assets
- $70,319
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WINTER BUSH 11-630 (President)
- FANNY HUNG 11-630 (Vice President)
- AMANDA CLEMENTS 11-630 (Vice President)
- AMANDA CLEMENTS 71-1231 (President)
- KIMILIA JONES 71-1231 (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- WINTER BUSH 11-630 (President)
- FANNY HUNG 11-630 (Vice President)
- AMANDA CLEMENTS 11-630 (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bearkat PTO parents and/or guardians, we assisted our school with their Fall Fundraiser. Bearkat PTO hosted Trunk/Treat and spring event for all students to attend. Bearkat PTO also funded incentive prizes for good behavior Bearkat Bucks Prize Card, perfect attendance, Imagine Reading and Imagine Math achievements. Also, the PTO fund several student events such as the Buddy Day and etc. Along with that, Bearkat PTO enhanced the culture of Shirley Brothers Elementary by providing acts of appreciation for teachers and staff that includes and not limited to stocking the breakrooms on monthly basis, Teacher Appreciation Week, Teacher Inservices Lunches, Holiday Social Hour at a local restaurant.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.5%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.97; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -27.8% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 52.4% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.