Bearcat Swim Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460954779
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Keizer, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5038845580
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Swimming & Other Water Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,884
- Expenses
- $15,794
- Assets
- $871
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MATT BOLES (President)
- MELINDA ROY (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- MATT BOLES (President)
- MELINDA ROY (Vice President)
- JENNIFER DARST (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote and facilitate competitive swimming in the mid-willamette valley area.
What it reported doing in 2014
Bearcat swim club accomplishmentsthroughout the 2013-14 swim season bearcat swim club maintained its mission to empower young people to be champions in life through excellence in swimming by maintaining the club's vision to provide a swimming environment in which excellence is a standard and where our club members are challenged to fully develop their human and competitive potentials.the bearcat swim club coaching staff works to promote high self-esteem and goal achievement through the pursuit of personal excellence and educationally sound values in relation to club member' success in training, competition and life. Bearcat swim club encourages young people to become well-rounded young men and women who are able to face challenges with courage and are eager to assume leadership roles in their school and club activities now so as to be prepared to become the leaders of tomorrow.club growththroughout 2014 bearcat swim club maintained a constant 120-125 swimmers and had a waiting list of potential club members desirous of joining the club. The club was prevented from further growth only because facilities were being used to capacity.the bearcat masters swim team continued to grow increasing its membership to around 30.competitive accomplishmentsthe bearcat swim club competitiveness increased over the 2013-14 season and had at the end of the 2014 season one boy and one girl qualified individually for the USA swimming junior national championships and three more girls making up a relay qualifying squad. There were five girls and two boys qualified for the ncsa junior national championships, and 12 athletes qualified for the western sectional championships.structurethe bearcat swim club is structured in the following age and ability segregated roster groups: cubs 1: (25 members) this first level of competitive swimming is intended for swimmers between ages 6 and 10 who are new and developing as competitive swimmers. This squad focuses on swimming, diving and turning with proper technique. Body position, kicking, going fast and having fun are focus points for this group.cubs 2: (20 members) this level is intended for more experienced 10 and under swimmers. Swimmers continue to focus on technique in all strokes, starts and turns while learning more about racing strategy. This group works hard, has fun and learns the proper skills to swim fast.red squad: (23 members) intended for swimmers between ages 11 and 14 who are competitive, enjoy swimming and are considering what it will take to get to the next level. Daily training is encouraged as necessary to continue progression in the sport. Focust on proper technique is heightened and there is greater emphasis on speed, power and endurance. Goal setting and time management are taught to prepare for the next step.black squad: (27 members) for 11-14 year olds athletes at the state level and focused on achieving more state "a" times and sectional times. Five practices per week require commitment and dedication to the team and to the sport of swimming. Black squad athletes work on all aspects of competitive swimming - including technique, dry land, psychology, nutrition and race strategy. Swimmers learn to accept challenges and guidance from the coaching staff, effectively communicate questions and ideas to staff, experience peer and family support, and develop a sound work ethic to achieve personal goals. Swimmers take part in the competition schedule under coaching staff guidance.senior squad: (29 members) this training squad is comprised of high school-aged athletes and a select group of 13 and over athletes. There are six to eight practices per week with participation in select meets and events predicated on achieved attendance marks. The senior squad is committed student athletes who have demonstrated the ability to exercise in a high-intensity training environment year-round. Commitment to training and goals both in and out of the pool are necessary with training that is geared toward p
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -45.1%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 60.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -80.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -50.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -71.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.