Bean Path
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 821523381
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Jackson, MS, USA
- Phone
- 7692083567
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $747,145
- Expenses
- $865,250
- Assets
- $533,772
- Liabilities
- $33,159
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR NASHLIE SEPHUS (CEO)
- TAMIKA JENKINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- TAMIKA JENKINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $43,269 total reported compensation
- TONIE SEPHUS (HR & FINANCE OFFICER): $19,831 total reported compensation
- DR CRESTON BURSE (DEPUTY DIRECTOR): $15,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create equity steam opportunities & cultivate the talent in Mississippi by providing access to tools, knowledge, & networks to educate and strengthen the community, starting with jackson, Mississippi. The organization's goals include exposing people to possibilities and opportunities, growing the tech echosytem, empowering people to develop and share new tech skills, and mentoring entrepreneurs and innovators through steam challenges and careers.
What it reported doing in 2024
During the past project year, the bean path was able to not only complete all expected results, but in many cases exceed them. This year, the organization celebrated the 6th anniversary of the bean path and wanted to expand its reach and impact in the community. The goal was to cultivate entrepreneurial and innovative talent in Mississippi through being the one-stop tech-facing source that provides access to the tools, knowledge, and network necessary to educate, innovate and build a strong, inspired, future workforce. The bean path promised to provide low-income and under-employed program participants with a group and/or individualized instruction at no cost. Subject matter expert facilitators introduced and imparted new concepts and methodologies that build on digital literacy awareness, development, and implementation. The organization promised to offer free to low-cost certified programming by expanding community partnerships with other organizations that align with the bean path's mission.below are just some of the successes the organization experienced during 2024:- hired 9 contractors this year to assist with an ambassador program, software development, partnership management, legislative assistance, and information technology. - launched its first app sponsored by entergy- launched a new program "steam tuesdays", which is an afterschool program for youth k-12- completed the 3rd cohort of oats in december. Two new classes graduated and alumni classes continue to return for next level training. - hosted three tech talks and had approximately 50 people in attendance- 206 unique individuals attended the makerspace classes (not counting anniversary events)- sipp and classes are a hit and bean path is hopeful that it will have more attendees and be more profitable- multiple youth robotics clubs are going well. Bean path hosted a robotic scrimmage and approximately 8 youths participated in the competition. -highest attended event in december oats graduation with 50+ attendees
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.6%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 71.3%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 37.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.6% of revenue deployed · 71.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $617K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $43K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.