Beacon of Light
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330819192
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Costa Mesa, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9492372584
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Planning Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $248,941
- Expenses
- $311,965
- Assets
- $79,551
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANN OWEN (PRESIDENT, S)
Highest reported compensation
- AMBER L AUGER (EXECUTIVE DI): $70,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to help educate teens regarding their sexual health: to guide them towards healthy decision-making based on the most current medical and scientific data, with the goal of preventing both the physical and emotional consequences of having sex at a young age.
What it reported doing in 2025
We speak to over 10,000 teens in orange county, California a year, talking about the real consequences of treating sex casually. Beacon of light provides a perspective not often heard through the media and popular society, but one that offers hope and support for making wise choices today, safeguarding their future.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 6
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.2%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 54.4%; rating input score 54
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -25.3%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.4%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 93.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.2% of revenue deployed · 54.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $170K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $70K · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.